2008, Paraguay, San Pedro
2008, Paraguay, San Pedro, Capiíbary, A&M 252 Show on map
2011, Brazil, Mato Grosso do Sul, west of Caracol, A&M 719 Show on map
2011, Brazil, Mato Grosso do Sul, Caracol, A&M 720 Show on map
2011, Brazil, Mato Grosso do Sul, Caracol, A&M 726 Show on map
Synonyms
Echinocactus hartmannii*, Discocactus magnimammus ssp. bonitoensis, Discocactus hartmannii ssp giganteus, Discocactus magnimammus, Discocactus hartmannii ssp magnimammus, Discocactus heptacanthus ssp. magnimammus, Discocactus mamillosus, Discocactus pachytele, Discocactus patulifolius, Discocactus hartmannii ssp patulifolius, Discocactus hartmannii ssp setosiflorus, Discocactus silicicola
* Basionym
Distribution
Brazil (Goiás, Mato Grosso do Sul), Paraguay (Amambay, Caaguazú, San Pedro)
Conservation status
Comments
Following some surveys conducted in October 2008 in Paraguay between Capiibary (Dpt. San Pedro) and Ygatimí / Reserva Natural del Bosque Mbaracayú (Dpt. Canendiyú) through Curuguaty (still Dpt. Canendiyú), we noticed that the campos cerrados / limpios of this area of the country, that represent part of the habitat of Discocactus hartmannii (K. Scumann) Britton & Rose (Esser 1982, 46, fig. 25; vegetation map out of the text), are disappearing because of their conversion into agricultural land, a danger that has already been filed by Metzing (1994). The area of the Reserva Natural del Bosque Mbaracayú, on the border with Brazil, is well protected and also includes some cerrados, but we could not detect the presence of D. hartmannii. The only useful survey of the taxon was done in Capiibary, near the homonymous river, in the territory of one estancia which is still not used as agricultural land. The population encountered consists of approximately fifteen pieces arranged on a piece of land of about 200 square meters, among the fields of another property. Although we do not have sufficient data relating to the conservation status of D. hartmannii throughout its geographic range, it seems appropriate to point out a possible risky situation that should be investigated with further research. For this reason we suggest an updated assessment of the conservation of the taxon from Least Concern, LC, (Hunt et al. 2006, Text: 326) to Data Deficient, DD. (October 2010)
Genus
Other species